Wolf D. Fuhrig

Home

10-06-02

Mideast Dispute Polarizes Academia


You may not hear about it in the media, but the confrontations between the pro-Sharon and anti-Sharon partisans on American campuses have grown in intensity. At times, academic freedom is in jeopardy. There are no clear battle lines between Israelis and Palestinians, or between pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian Americans because both sides have their hardliners and their voices for moderation.

A typical controversy recently arose when Hanan Ashrawi, the Palestinian activist, was invited to keynote a symposium at Colorado College. Probably the most respected Palestinian voice on American campuses, Mrs. Ashrawi is a Christian from Ramallah, a Ph.D. in comparative literature from the University of Virginia, a dean at Bir Zeit University, and for three years a minister of higher education for the Palestinian Authority. She angered her detractors by characterizing the Hamas resistance members as freedom fighters against the Israeli occupation. Governor Owens called the College's invitation to her outrageous.

The two most prominent hardline Israelis, prime minister Ariel Sharon and his predecessor, Binyamin "Bibi" Netanyahu, don't need college campuses to get a hearing in America. They are warmly welcomed at the White House and on Capitol Hill where Palestinians get no hearing. Netanyahu testified before the House Committee on Government Reform on what to do about Saddam Hussein--as if there are no American experts on that issue. In an address to U.S. Senators, Bibi brazenly equated the Al Qaeda terror against Americans with the Palestinians struggle against the destruction of life and property by Israeli occupation forces.

Netanyahu's cordial reception on the Hill starkly contrasted with the angry reception he received when he came to Concordia University in Montreal. Fearing for his safety, the Canadian police decided to call the event off. In a similar display of protest at the Berkeley (California) campus, Netanyahu's appearance also had to be canceled. The Likud-inspired Middle East Forum recently launched a web site called "Campus Watch." It presently blacklists 14 universities and 8 professors considered "actively hostile to America's interests in the world" and fanning "the flames of disinformation, incitement, and ignorance."

The persons and institutions deemed anti-American are in reality anti-Israeli, i.e., opposed to the policies of the official U.S.-Israeli alliance. For Professor Daniel Pipes, the founder of the Middle East Forum, however, being "anti-Israel" is synonymous with being "anti-American." This view was recently echoed by Harvard President Lawrence Summers who characterized criticism of Israel as reprehensible anti-Semitism. (Never mind, Arabs are Semites too!)

Campus Watch condemned Colorado College for inviting Hanan Ashrawi, and the University of North Carolina for assigning freshmen to read a few passages from the Qur'an. Campus Watch invites "students to alert it to egregious cases of professorial bias." According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, numerous faculty members have been denouncing Campus Watch as a tactic designed to intimidate or even silence those whose professional teaching and writing does not toe the Likud line. Literature professor Judith Butler at Berkeley told Campus Watch:

"I have recently learned that your organization is compiling dossiers on professors at U.S. academic institutions who oppose the Israeli occupation and its brutality, actively support Palestinian rights for self-determination, as well as a more informed and intelligent view of Islam than is currently represented in the U.S. media. I would be enormously honored to be counted among those who actively hold these positions and would like to be included in the list of those who are struggling for justice."

Henry Munson of the International School of Information Management, claims that any scholar who discusses the discrimination against the Baha'i in Iran, slavery in Sudan, or the Islamist intellectuals in Egypt runs the risk of being called a Zionist or an agent of American imperialism. Conversely, of course, anyone who dares to criticize the policies of Sharon runs the risk of being called an anti-Semite or a self-hating Jew.

At a time when America's Mideast Studies departments are urgently needed as sources of reliable information and compassionate reasoning, outside agitators, such as Campus Watch, only intensify their politicization and polarization.