Wolf D. Fuhrig

Home

02-08-04

Those Blair-Faced Lies

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." President Bush made this unsubstantiated statement in his report on the State of the Union on January 28, 2003. His friend, British Prime Minister Blair, had given him the information claiming that British intelligence had obtained it from "independent sources."

Specifically, the allegation referred to the uranium mines in the West African state of Niger. The executives of the country's two extracting companies, Somair and Cominak, responded to Blair's allegation "with surprise, disbelief, amusement and denials," and Niger's prime minister assured the media: "We have never discussed uranium with Iraq."

I learned the details about Niger's French-controlled uranium production straight from a report in London's Sunday Telegraph and discussed them in my Sunday column on August 10 under the heading "Fabricating yellowcake."

Worldwide, officials and commentators snickered about the failure of national security adviser Condaleezza Rice and CIA chief George Tenet to vet the President's speech and spare him the embarrassment. Not until half a year later, however, on Friday, July 11, did Tenet admit: "This was a mistake." Tony Blair, however, the purveyor of the phony charge never apologized to either the American or the British people.

To provide more reasons for an invasion of Iraq, Blair asserted --without any proof--that Saddam Hussein was able to deploy weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes and that, according to information "from a high-ranking Iraqi defector," Iraq possessed several tons of the deadly nerve agent VX.

It was also Blair who advanced the notion that Saddam cooperated with Bin Laden. Yet, according to the British Observer, already on February 10, five weeks before the invasion, Blair had received a confidential assessment--made public only September 11--by the Government's Joint Intelligence Committee that there was no evidence Iraq had provided chemical or biological weapons to al-Qaida.

Now America's chief weapons inspector, David Kay, has at long last confirmed what other inspectors, such as Rolf Ekeus, Scott Ritter, and Hans Blix, had long asserted: that Saddam Hussein destroyed his stockpiles after the first Gulf War. Bush, Blair, and their neo-conservative allies, however, remained so enthralled by their mirage of nuclear and chemical weapons in the Iraqi desert that they would rather face ridicule than admit their exaggerations. Whenever they were asked to explain the failure to find those weapons, they routinely explained what nobody disputes: that the world is better off without Saddam.

Blair and Bush thought that his forcible removal could best be justified if Saddam possessed those weapons of mass destruction. Now they claim that, even if he did not have WMDs, there is evidence that he had scientists, laboratories, containers, and documents that could have been used again for the developments of WMDs.

Spy satellites had actually photographed "suspicious" convoys of trailer trucks in the western Iraqi desert. They could have carried nuclear or chemical bombs but the inspectors soon discovered that they did not. Since Hans Blix's team did not find what Messrs. Blair and Bush wanted to see unearthed, they lost confidence in the inspectors and invaded Iraq, on the assumption that their dreams of stockpiled WMDs may yet come true.

As long as Tony Blair simply spread misinformation from his intelligence sources, he did not bear false witness. Once he repeated, however, what was proven to be untrue, he became guilty of barefaced lying.

Now he has set up his own inquiry into the accuracy of the intelligence he received, but not, as he explicitly stipulated, into how intelligence findings were used in support of his political judgments. He appointed Lord Butler of Brockwell, a retired Westminster bureaucrat, to chair the inquiry and report the results directly to him.

Lord Butler has a consistent forty-year record of not rocking Britain's ship of state. The Daily Mail promptly greeted him with the headline: "Enter Lord Cover-Up."

 
[To contact the author, phone (217) 243-2423 or e-mail ;
for other articles, log on to http://www.independentcritic.com]