Wolf D. Fuhrig

Home

06-25-06

Karen’s “Ambassadors”

“The United States welcomes all religions and rewards immigrants who embrace its democratic values with opportunities and freedom beyond their dreams.” This is the message the U.S. State Department wants “civilian ambassadors,” preferably Muslims, carry to Europe, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and the South Pacific. Presently, four American Muslims are trying to spread their assigned message on an eight-day tour to three European countries.

The program is the brain child of Karen Hughes, the undersecretary of state for public diplomacy. In her opinion, many foreigners believe that Muslims in the U.S. are persecuted and that American Muslims are best qualified to refute such allegations.

If Ms. Hughes had researched media commentaries and public opinion abroad since the invasion of Iraq, she would have noticed that the problems of American Muslims are one of the least mentioned issues. It is true that immediately after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington D.C., Attorney John Ashcroft ordered the rounding up and imprisonment, without charges, of hundreds of Muslims. Many more American Muslims, however, did not suffer disadvantages at all and remain economically and political largely integrated into American society. It is from this segment that Ms. Hughes chose her “civilian ambassadors.”

The really tough questions asked abroad about recent American conduct and American policies toward Muslims and Arabs remain essentially unanswered. How was it possible that torture could occur at Abu Ghraib prison? Who was ultimately responsible for those misdeeds? Why is it necessary to hold foreign nationals at the Guantanamo prison indefinitely without due process of law? Given the high standards Americans like to set for themselves, it is certainly an unenviable task for Ms. Hughes and her boss, Secretary Rice, to answer questions about alleged violations of international law to the satisfaction of America’s critics.

While it can validly be argued that the mistreatment of prisoners has never been officially condoned by any U.S. government, it is far more difficult for Americans to explain to foreigners key elements of the Bush administration’s foreign policy. Why do we continue to support the oppressive 39-year old Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories? That is usually one of the first political questions Arabs tend to raise with Americans. The powerful U.S. government imposes its will upon every other country in the Middle East, why is it so unwilling to make the government of Israel end the chaos and the agony in Gaza and the West Bank?

Other foreign policy questions are just as difficult to answer. Does the U.S. intend to maintain its control over the Muslim nations between the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea indefinitely? Do Americans seriously think they can end the violent terrorist resistance and the non-violent hostility to America’s uninvited presence in the region with military means alone?

Considering the gravity of those questions, Ms. Hughes’ hope to change the foreign disapproval of American policies in the Middle East is naïve at best. Mr. Bush explained why he wanted her, rather than an experienced career diplomat, as undersecretary of state for public diplomacy: “Karen has got good instincts. She can spot a phony a mile away. Her voice is one of reason and honesty. Plus, Karen is someone who knows that it’s so important to be proactive as opposed to defensive.”

Yet, according to The Washington Post, Karen herself had already doubts about her qualifications when she served Mr. Bush in Texas: “I know I don’t know a lot,” she conceded but she believes she knows Mr. Bush. “I know where he stands,” she explained. “I know the governor. I know his principles, and I try to be a pretty effective communicator of what he believes. But I don’t make any pretense that I know how to do this nationally.”

Ironically, now she serves the President internationally, charged with the heavy responsibility for all of the State Department’s educational and cultural affairs as well as all international information programs.


[To contact the author, phone (217) 243-2423 or e-mail ;
for other articles, log on to http://www.independentcritic.com]