Wolf D. Fuhrig

Home

08-12-07

More Media Might For Murdoch

The Wall Street Journal, America's premier business newspaper since its founding in 1889, has been sold to Rupert Murdoch, arguably the world’s most voracious media magnate. There were reports that he had been itching for years to incorporate the Journal and its parent company, Dow Jones, into his empire.

He was willing to offer $60 for a Dow Jones share--or $5 billion for the total purchase--at a time when the stock was trading just above $36. By the day of the sale, Dow Jones shares had gained 59 percent while Murdoch’s News Corporation lost almost 6 percent.

Murdoch’s career as a media owner began in 1952 after he inherited his father’s newspaper shares and gradually bought more weeklies, dailies, and magazines in his native Australia. He also founded the country’s first national newspaper, The Australian. In 1968 he expanded into Britain’s media market where he purchased the popular News of the World, The Sun, as well as The Times and The Sunday Times, both respected at home and abroad.

In 1973, Murdoch purchased his first paper in the United States, the San Antonio Express-News, in 1976 the New York Post. Then he added to his holdings a supermarket tabloid named Star. While continuing to shop for print media deals in Australia and the U.S., he also moved into, and since has dominated, the British pay-television market.

Murdoch could not acquire electronic media properties in the U.S., however, until in 1985 he decided to become a naturalized American and thus satisfy the legal requirement that only citizens may own U.S. television stations. He soon got his hands on Twentieth Century Fox and the Fox Television Network and subsequently gave America The Simpsons and the feature film Titanic.

In 1995, competitors charged that Murdoch’s ownership of the Fox Network was illegal while he owned his Australian-based News Limited. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), however, disagreed when it arrived at the controversial ruling that Murdoch’s ownership of Fox was in the public’s best interest. Actually, the 24-hour Fox cable news gradually eroded CNN’s market share so much that Fox felt sufficiently emboldened to call itself “the most-watched cable news channel,” a vast exaggeration.

Four years ago, Murdoch spent $6 billion on acquiring--from General Motors--a 34 percent stake in Hughes Electronics, the operator of DirecTV, America’s largest television system. In a deal with MCI Communications, Murdoch developed a major news website and recently bought Intermix Media, including MySpace.com, for $580 million.

Not satisfied with owning numerous different media in the English-speaking world, Murdoch recently purchased the Turkish television channel TGRT in partnership with a “Turkish recording mogul.” Rumors have it that U.S. citizen Murdoch may have had to acquire Turkish citizenship for the deal to be legal.

The acquisition of Dow Jones gives Murdoch control over what may arguably be the world’s most entrenched organization, staff, and brand name for the gathering and evaluation of economic news. He now owns what it takes to implement his ambitious plan for the creation of a global Fox business channel that can effectively compete against Reuters, Bloomberg, and General Electric’s CNBC.

Had Murdoch amassed his world-wide multi-media empire during the administrations of Theodore or Franklin Roosevelt, the Justice Department’s anti-trust division would have raised serious legal objections to Murdoch’s grandiose conglomerate of trusts. Today, however, his $5 billion purchase of Dow Jones & Company may easily pass regulatory review, precisely because Murdoch's media empire is not yet dominating any particular product or region.

Murdoch has never wavered in using his electronic and print media, Fox Television foremost among them, to push his ideological and business interests. Those who argue that his insatiable grab for media power simply reflects an aggressive businessman’s skillful exploitation of the free market forget that America’s present oligopoly of media tycoons was made possible by the lax rules Congress and the FCC established.

Let us not forget that any society wanting to be free and democratic must vigilantly oppose those that try to stifle diversity of ownership and viewpoints in its media.


[To contact the author, phone (217) 243-2423 or e-mail ;
for other articles, log on to http://www.independentcritic.com]